BlogguideEpistemological and metaphysical questions

July 21, 2021by Dataman0

Hits: 1

Epistemological and metaphysical questions Purpose:

The purpose of this discussion is for you to think critically about

epistemological and metaphysical questions and why you think

the way that you do and for you to argue for them. It is easy to

say what you think, but it is hard to back it up in a debate. This is

an extreme case, but working with it makes every-day cases

easier.

The Case:

Growing up, you had a near and dear childhood friend, call them

Andi Rossum.1 Now, for sleep-overs or slumber-parties, Andi

would not eat and the Rossums explained that this is because

Andi has a very special diet. You take classes together, play

together and Andi is your best friend. In your teens, while getting

into shenanigans, Andi cuts themselves and you notice that it’s

not blood which comes out, but rather a greenish-blue liquid. You

recognize it immediately as coolant, like in a car.

It turns out, the Rossums were researchers at a top secret

government lab. They fell in love and ended up having a baby,

which they named ‘Andi’. But this Andi died only a few years old

and the parents, distraught, used their accesses to various

technologies to build a ‘baby’. The brain is a computer and the

parts are exchanged to match growth patterns.2

But, does Andi have a mind? Are they conscious? Remember

that Andi is a machine. Epistemological and metaphysical questions

Tasks:

  1. For your initial post, you need to:
  2. Think carefully about the above case and then explain

whether you think Andi has a mind, are they conscious, do they feel, etc. Going outside of the case for a

moment, all of your real evidence your non–robotic

friends and family have minds is based on their

behavior, which is no difffferent than the evidence you

have that Andi has a mind.

  1. Say why you think that. As always with these cases,

you should not say merely that this is how you feel, but

rather explain why you have that feeling.

  1. Say how you think another student may reply to your

stance. Doing these 3 things is worth 10pts.

  1. Reply to 2 other students in this class who have opposing

views to you or take on the role as the devil’s advocate and

object to them. And, if possible, avoid replying in the way

that they thought someone might reply. Each reply is worth

5pts. Going above and beyond (more than 2 substantive

replies) is rewarded with extra credit.

Major Note: Epistemological and metaphysical questions

I have seen this several times and it really fails to answer the

questions. Many students try to make a distinction between

‘having a mind’ and ‘being conscious’. This is a distinction

without a relevant difffference. In order to be conscious, a thing

must have a mind and if a thing has a mind, then they are

conscious. Think of the mind as whatever is necessary for

consciousness, that is, it is impossible for something to be

conscious without having a mind.

Epistemological and metaphysical questions

To Succeed:

  1. Make sure you are clear about your stance, that you do not

devolve into name-calling and uncivil behavior.2. Debate and replies to replies are encouraged as this is

practice for real-world debates.

  1. Make sure that you have all of the above points in your

posts.

  1. I will comment replies if the post is very offff-the-mark in the

interpretation of the case, if it is unduly inflflammatory, or

otherwise not appropriate.

For a real world case where people have been fooled by clever AI

programs, check out the following links:

(Links to an external site.)

AI Teaching Assistant Jill Watson

(Links to an external site.)

Ted Talk

(Links to an external site.)

For fifictional examples of trying to determine whether some

android has a mind, I recommend the following:

Star Trek The Next Generation, Season 2 Episode 9, The

Measure of a Man.

Star Trek The Next Generation, Season 6 Episode 9, The Quality

of Life.

Footnote(s):

1 The name ‘Rossum’ is in reference to the play Rossum’s Universal

Robots, by Karel Capek which is the fifirst use of the word ‘robot’ in English. It

comes from the Czeck word ‘robotnik’, meaning ‘forced worker’, as in a slave

or serf.

2 A quick note, a computer can learn, the basic level way that this is done is

described in the module concerning AI. Epistemological and metaphysical questions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *